COMPARISON

AppCrane vs AppDeploy

Both take you from an AI conversation to a running app. The difference is where it runs and who holds the keys. AppDeploy is a hosted "chat to live URL" service on the vendor's cloud — smooth for indie and consumer projects. AppCrane is the self-hosted, enterprise-grade, agent-first alternative: the same flow, on infrastructure you own, with SSO, RBAC, audit, and a secret hard-wall.

Get AppCrane on GitHub ↗ See the deploy flow

Honest framing

AppDeploy is genuinely good at what it does: describe an app in chat, get a live URL, no server to manage. It's a hosted SaaS, which means the vendor runs the machines, holds your code, and stores your secrets on their multi-tenant cloud. For a side project or a demo, that convenience is the whole point.

AppCrane is for the moment that convenience becomes a liability — when the app touches customer data, internal systems, or model API keys you can't hand to a third party. It keeps the agent-first, one-command feel but lands every deploy on your Ubuntu server, inside your network, under your compliance controls.

built-in ~ partial / with caveats no
AppCraneAppDeploy
Hosting modelSelf-hosted, your boxHosted vendor cloud
Data residencyYour VPC / on-premVendor multi-tenant
Secret hard-wall (operator can't read keys)
Your model API keys stay on your box
Agent / MCP control
Enterprise SSO (SAML/OIDC/SCIM)
Four-role RBAC + per-user audit~
Sandbox + production envs~
Managed repo (no GitHub account)
Open sourceAGPL-3.0
Air-gap / on-prem friendly
No vendor lock-in

Pick the right one

Pick AppDeploy if…

  • You want zero infrastructure — no server to run or patch.
  • It's a side project, prototype, or consumer app.
  • Your code and secrets living on a vendor cloud is acceptable.
  • You don't need SSO, RBAC, or an audit trail.
  • Fastest possible "chat to URL" beats everything else.

Pick AppCrane if…

  • Data sovereignty matters — your infrastructure, your data.
  • Your model API keys must never leave your box.
  • You need enterprise SSO, four-role RBAC, and per-user audit for compliance.
  • You run in a VPC, on-prem, or an air-gapped-friendly environment.
  • You want an open-source platform with no vendor lock-in.
  • You still want the agent-first, deploy-from-chat workflow.

The enterprise difference

Your infrastructure, your data. AppCrane runs on a server you provision — cloud VM, on-prem host, or an isolated network. Nothing round-trips through a vendor tenant.

Your keys never leave the building. The secret hard-wall is middleware-enforced: even the operator can't read app env vars, and the database returns ciphertext. When your agent sets an API key, it stays encrypted on your box.

Compliance-ready by default. SAML/OIDC/SCIM SSO, four roles (Platform Owner / App Owner / App Admin / App User), and per-user token-bound audit on every action — the controls a security review actually asks about.

Frequently asked

What's the core difference?

AppDeploy is hosted on the vendor's cloud; AppCrane is self-hosted on yours. Same agent-first deploy flow, different trust boundary.

Is AppCrane a self-hosted AppDeploy alternative?

Yes — a one-command install on your Ubuntu server keeps code and secrets in your VPC or on-prem environment.

Does AppCrane support AI agents too?

Yes. It exposes 35 appcrane_* MCP tools to Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex. See Deploy from Claude.

Can the operator read my secrets?

No — the secret hard-wall returns ciphertext even to direct database access.

Comparison reflects typical default capabilities as of mid-2026 and general characteristics of hosted "chat to live URL" services. Products evolve — verify specifics against each vendor's current docs. "~" marks features that exist but require a higher tier, add-ons, or aren't publicly documented.

Related

AppCrane — self-hosted · open source · agent-native github.com/gitayg/appCrane ↗