// moorai vs prompt security

MoorAI vs Prompt Security

MoorAI reviews prompts on the device — so content never leaves the machine, and it wraps the AI agents you already run: Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot CLI. Every prompt is checked locally against policy before it reaches the agent, and security teams see only redacted, content-free signals.

Prompt Security is a gateway/cloud AI-security service — prompts are sent to the service for analysis. This is an honest, architecture-level comparison: on-device review versus gateway/cloud analysis.

Prompt Security and MoorAI are aimed at different blast radii. Prompt Security is a gateway/cloud layer for organization-wide gen-AI use: traffic to the SaaS AI tools and chatbots your whole company touches is routed through it and inspected in transit. MoorAI is narrower and closer in — it lives on each developer's machine and governs the coding agents they run, reviewing every prompt locally so the content never has to reach a gateway at all.

MoorAI Prompt Security
Where prompts are reviewed On the device In the gateway / cloud
Prompt content leaves the machine Never Sent to the service
Deployment model Self-hosted, on-device Gateway / cloud service
Coding-agent-native (wraps the CLI / PTY) ✓ Claude Code · Codex · Copilot CLI Gen-AI app / gateway security
Blocks secrets read into agent context ✓ Claude Code hooks · Codex / Copilot CLI detect-only Local file reads never cross the gateway
MCP tool-call interception (arguments) ✓ Inspects mcp__* call arguments Not stated at the endpoint agent layer
MCP allow-list enforced at call time ✓ Non-allow-listed servers blocked
Reviews AI output, not just prompts ✓ Output-stage detectors + CLI redaction Yes — prompts and responses inline
Runs fully on-device (no egress) ✓ Always Gateway / cloud service
Content-free telemetry ✓ Category, risk level, one-way hash Content inspected in the gateway
AIBOM export (AI bill of materials) ✓ HTML / JSON / CSV, CycloneDX-loose Org-wide gen-AI app discovery
Signals to security team Redacted, content-free Cloud-analyzed
Licensing Open source (AGPL-3.0) Proprietary
Account required to start No (community agent) Yes

The honest take. Prompt Security is genuinely strong at giving a security team one enforcement point over org-wide SaaS gen-AI — every employee and copilot, DLP and policy applied centrally. MoorAI solves a narrower problem — governing the coding agents your developers run, with prompt content kept on the device instead of routed through a gateway.

Note: SentinelOne announced its acquisition of Prompt Security in August 2025; Prompt Security's capabilities are being folded into the SentinelOne platform. Comparison is architecture-level and reflects the products' stated deployment models. MoorAI keeps prompt content on the device; Prompt Security analyzes prompts in its gateway/cloud service. Any capability figures are approximate — verify current specifics against each vendor's docs. A “—” cell means we could not confirm the capability either way from published material; it is not a claim that the capability is absent.

Recently shipped in MoorAI — all on-device and content-free: a lethal-trifecta detector, rules-file poisoning detection (CLAUDE.md / .cursorrules), a capture-tier toggle (content-free by default), per-tool MCP argument rules, a per-agent assurance score, a data-lineage / Event Flow view, on-device model escalation, and cryptographically signed agency decisions — mapped across OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST CSF, NIST AI RMF, SOC 2, ISO 27001/42001, and the EU AI Act.

← Back to MoorAI MoorAI vs Lakera Guard → MoorAI vs Netskope → MoorAI vs Cycode → Community agent on GitHub ↗
glick.run — AGPL-3.0